Wed 07, Dec 2022
lawyers line
You are in Home » Law News » International » 9th Circuit mulls high school’s ban on US flag T shirts to avoid Cinco de Mayo trouble
By LL News|Email the author|Oct 18,2013   (8977 views)
In a case that pits First Amendment rights of young Americans to display pride in their country against the power of high school administrators to take reasonable measures to promote student safety, a federal appellate panel heard oral arguments Thursday about whether to revive a lawsuit brought by former students who wanted to wear T-shirts featuring the U.S. flag.
A federal district court nixed their suit last year over the May 2010 incident at a Northern California school. Former Chief U.S. District Judge James Ware ruled that potential for `substantial disruption` on Cinco de Mayo justified a decision by administrators of Live Oak High School in Morgan Hill, Calif., to require the plaintiffs to turn their T-shirts inside-out or go home on that one day, the San Jose Mercury News reports.
However, at least one judge on the San Francisco-based 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals panel suggested today that the approach was constitutionally lopsided, a subsequentMercury News article reports.
`If you have tolerance days, you have to endure the views of anti-tolerance,` Judge Sidney Thomas told a lawyer for the Morgan Hill Unified School District.
A history of strife between Hispanic and Anglo students on the May 5 holiday—which began with an unlikely Mexican victory in battle against the French more than 100 years ago and today commemorates pride in the Mexican heritage—led to the American flag T-shirt ban.
`This is not a case about the flag, or the First Amendment rights of adults in a public forum,` said the school district in a court filing. `This is a case about whether we allow school administrators, familiar with the circumstances in their schools, to take reasonable steps to protect student safety in the face of threats and a history of violence.`
Law professor Eugene Volokh of the University of California-Los Angeles said there is solid authority for the district`s position, although the plaintiffs` desire to display pride in the American flag is, of course, likely to elicit a sympathetic response.
`In a sense, it`s a heckler`s veto,` he said of school administrators` decision not to risk disruption of the learning environment by allowing the plaintiffs to wear their T-shirts.

Related links :
  |   Gallery gallery
Recent Comments
Post your comments
Name :
Enter your Name 
Email ID :
Enter your Email ID 
Comments :
Solve this  
Related News
An Indian-origin law student has sued Manhattan`s top federal prosecutor Preet Bharara and the US Justice Department claiming she was unlawfully questioned and her cell phone confiscated after she sen[..]
A Missouri prosecutor who dropped charges in a controversial rape case will ask a court to appoint a special prosecutor to review the facts and look at possibly refiling charges.
Nodaway County[..]
India and Latvia signed an agreement for providing tax stability to residents of both countries and facilitate economic cooperation by stimulating flow of investment, technology and services.
San Francisco`s city attorney sent a letter to Nevada officials this week demanding that California cities and counties be repaid for the treatment costs for some 500 psychiatric patients who were giv[..]
Subscribe Now
Subscribe to the Newletter
I have read and agree to the Privacy Policy
Indian No. 1 Remarriage Matrimony
Copyright © 2011 Lawyers Line.. All rights reserved